Celebrated Murder

I honestly believe that some not too distant day in the future, mankind will look upon the abortion of human infants in the same light as we do the Holocaust.

I hate the argument that abortion is justified because a “woman has a right over her own body.” I wholeheartedly agree with that notion but I also believe that the dominion over the life of the human baby growing in her womb is where that right ends. If women want to exercise their right to use their body how they wish, they should begin by exercising their right to keep their knees together. There is an obvious cause and effect relationship to be applied, and I am ever mystified at the way pregnant mothers can rationalize aborting their baby after they chose to have sex.

Please keep in mind that I am deigning to use the word “abortion” instead of “murder” for the sake of maintaining an air of reasonability.

Too often do we hear the argument of “what if a woman is raped and becomes impregnated from that rape?” The impersonal side of me says, “Sorry, but shit happens and just because a woman got shat upon doesn’t necessitate the killing of an innocent baby.” The empathetic side of me says, “I’m very sorry for the pain that woman is suffering, but shit happens and that baby did nothing to warrant death. Put the child up for adoption if nothing else.” Besides, I’ve known quite a few women who’ve been victims of sexual assaults and none have subsequently gotten pregnant. Is it common for pregnancies to come from rape? Somehow, I don’t think so.



The uses of specific words have very direct and intended reactions. Notice that a baby only seconds away from birth is still a “fetus” but the moment that baby squirts out it is only then deemed a “baby?” Ever notice? Why, on earth, would such a distinction be made? The answer is all too obvious. Were the unborn baby actually called a “baby” then abortion would be 1) illegal because the laws would, at least by definition, recognize the unborn as human life, and b) impossible for a mother to kill her “baby.” See, a fetus is a medical term for a growing bunch of cells with no soul, no personality, no face, and no name. How hard is it to kill a bunch of gooey cells? Now, if the unborn baby were called a “baby,” how hard would it be for the mother to have it killed? All of a sudden, because she used to play with baby dolls as a child and imagine the day when she’d start her own family, the baby has a face and a name and a personality…it’s nothing short of murder.

And what about the irrational and extreme feminists who shove the nobility of abortion down the throat of young pregnant women? Set aside the obvious tragedy, and tell me if they ever stop to think about the effects that that abortion will have on the mother? Except for the extremist nut-jobs who are non-emotional and wholly driven by their super-left-wing ideas, have you ever met a woman who had an abortion and doesn’t now regret the decision? I’m sorry, but the average, normal person, man or woman, knows that a pregnancy means a baby and understands that if their baby doesn’t live to take its first breath of air…then their baby died. How much more sorrow is heaped upon the shoulders of a woman when she realizes that exercising “her right” wasn’t so noble and she was the reason that her baby died?

What I want is a doctor or an expert in the obstetrics or neo-natal field to explain to me how being inside of the womb one second and then outside of the womb the next second delineates the difference between being a fetus and a baby. I’m dying to know. Is it the difference between breathing amniotic fluid versus air? If that’s the case, then Ed Harris in The Abyss became a fetus the moment he took in a lung-full of the fluid through which he breathed for deep diving. It has to be something else. In medicine, what makes a baby a baby and not a fetus?

Let’s, for a moment, agree that an unborn baby is a “fetus.” Okay, fine. Calling the gooey mass of cells a fetus instead of a baby is another way of saying that the gooey mass of cells is not human. Okay, fine, but what else is that gooey mass of cells going to be? Is there a chance that the woman may give birth to a fern? Or a pony? Has there ever been a pregnant woman to give birth to anything except for a human baby? No? Why in the hell are we calling the baby a fetus then? Just because it’s still in the womb? Bullshit. Maybe now you’re starting to put two and two together and realizing that the only reason to call a baby a “fetus” is to allow legal, guilt-free murders and has nothing to with medicine.

Barack Obama recently said that having a baby at sixteen years old is equivalent to being punished. What’s his answer then? Well, coming from the man who, a few months ago, got into a pissing match with Hillary over who would be more “progressive” in allowing late-term abortion, one can only assume that he’d recommend that the sixteen year old girl have an abortion. Stop, now, for a moment and think about the connotation here. This mindset is one promoting abortion for the sake of convenience! The girl makes a mistake and gets pregnant and poof! an abortion and everything is back to normal…no harm no foul, right? No one ever got to know that baby so they can easily make themselves forget it. It never said “I love you, mama” or shared its first beer with grandpa. Its short life was only a blip on the time-line of its mother…labeled as a “mistake.”

Ever find it ironic how we readily let perpetrators of the most horrific murders and atrocities continue to live as they sit on their laurels in our taxpayer funded prisons, yet we lawfully allow the most innocent among us to be murdered in the most gruesome manner imaginable? If I had to, I’d agree with the lefties to abolish the death penalty in exchange for making abortions illegal (with the exception of medical emergency). However, I’d rather make abortion illegal without having to compromise and institute a penalty of life in prison and, just like sex-offenders are made impotent, remove the perpetrators' reproductive capacity.